[my Ashford MAIN page] [^^^PNS home page]Techno Waves
See also: -[]- techno-waves.html this-file: frhl-techno-waves-future-debate-01 "How DO you keep 'em down on the farm?" This goes back to an old adage of how once kids have seen the "big city" they don't want to just be plain old farmers. So, these days, i might ask the question: How do you get 'em to take differential equations when insurance claims adjusters are making $200K + bonus'es?? I keep meeting all of these bright young kids (sort of reminds me of when is was a youngish nerdling), and they're all wizzing thru maths and science like it was so much cheese wiz. Sheesh, even i had more trouble than that. And then when i ask them what they're planning to be it's an accountant, or a financial analyst, or a med tech or a lawyer. And that's because they know (or at least think) that those will be always-in-demand-jobs. They can see the aging population all around them (ye cats! even *i*'m aging! ;) so med tech - like money in the bank. And they see all of the pop stars and such on tv and of course wanna be like them, but then things like "American Idol" and the reality shows about the stars and such show how much real fun that is. And then law suits: Ah! Atourney!!! And of course, someone has to count all of those rich people's money and advise them to invest it: Ah! Financian Planner, Accountant, etc. But, of course we (the "we" is supposedly in charge here of THE future) know that we'll be needing scientists and such in the future. But, where will they come from? Of course, then there's the EDU influx from other countries into the USA (and most likely Western European countries as well) from the so-called "third-world". Ah! They're the ones majoring in Computer Science. And, then there doesn't even seem any interest in physics and chemistry and all of that. Too much memorisation and where would you work or even GET work anyway? So, the whole mess is swirling more and more towards the money-worshiping civilisation that communism feared would be the end product of capitalistic evolution (or would it be de-evolution from the communist POV?). Enter the Futurists (e-commerce wise) ===================================== One of the completely typical "futurists" is James Canton who is CEO of The Intstitute for Global Futures, and his latest book "The Extreme Future" outlines the coming talent war, for example, he outlines the "Top Ten WorkForce" trends: 1. A global war for talent will be the top driver of competitive advantage, pitting nations and individuals, and companies against one another as talent grows scarce. 2. The future of the workforce should not be defined by geography, but by talent. 3. The aging population in America and Europe will have dramatic effects on society and the economy. 4. Hispanics and women will dominate the U.S. workforce. 5. Women will comprise a high percentage of new workers and leaders, forever changing the politics of boardrooms and markets. 6. Increased immigration will be necessary to enable available talent to keep up with the demands of business and society. 7. Finding high-tech skilled employees from a global talent pool will be the greatest challenge for every organization and every nation. 8. Innovation will be a key driver of workforce skills, requiring the education system to be completely overhauled. 9. The domestic workforce will grow more slowly because of dangerously lower fertility rates. 10. Workforce crises that arise in the near future will be traceable to lack of skilled workers. (Canton, 2006, P. 90) Now, there's nothing unique about this POV - in fact it's part and parcel with the entire "New American Century" that's already placed us on the road of war over oil. The warning signs have been there for years. See for example, "Three Days of the Condor" (film version) - as one of the characters in the film says, "And when there's no more oil, they [The American Public] won't ask why, they'll just want us to get the oil." - not an exact quote - and that was in 1977; ie, about a quarter of a century before the facts started to play out. Canton goes on to paint a picture of how the American work force will change in the next few years (and remember that Canton who refers to himself as "As a futurist managing a global think tank", so he's got quite a few people listening - who would dare not? And remember he's one of the good guys, who's at least concerned with what all of this change may do to "the common man in the street." He writes: Our world is changing fast. Cutting-edge innovations offer infomration at blazing speed. New threats to security greet us each morning in the headlines. Digital commerce races around the world in nanoseconds. Amid all of this speed, innovation, and change, however, one challenge in particular has the potential to enhance or destroy the future of the U.S. economy: Preparing for the next workforce and the coming talent war. This is a vitally important Extreme Future trend that will affect generations of citizens and corporations, as well as the nation's influence around the world. As a result, it must be addressed soon. America's workforce is changing in fundamental ways. This is an undeniable reality that is unraveling fast all around us. Today there are more than one million high-tech jobs that are not filled. This shortage is not just about people, but a lack of skills. Companies in the Innovative Economy, those on the front lines like Apple, Intel, and MicroSoft, have gone off-shore to do research and new product development because they cannot get the same talent here. Talent, skilled human capital, innovative high-tech savy people independent of any nation will be the lifeblood of the future organization. (Canton, Pp. 91-92) And this idea of the ever present danger of THE un-seen enemy isn't just fluff, it occurs again and again in the writing (and remember i'm just using him as an example, there are literally hundreds of these think-tank gurus that have the movers and shakers listening). Of course, where this is being driven is towards high-tech, high-speed change. As it turns out, this is nothing new in terms of how technology evovles. The well-known Moore's Law of circuit density doubling every so often (and accelerating) has been interpreted to also mean that in the next few years, we may find we have computers so complex, that there simply aren't enough programmers to program to their full capacity. That is, if the best computer programers can produce a maximum of 5_000 lines of "c" code (about 1/2 that in Java) in a week, then at some point it would take every man, woman, and child on the planet programming around the clock to fill the code requirements that some technologists see as early as 2020. Of course, one drive here is towards AI's that will be able to program other applications. We might think of this as a "toaster programmer". We create a learning machine and teach it (do we already need a gender-neutral third-person singular for a self-aware creature?). Anyway, we program it with everything about toasters, and it goes off and designs and builds the next NEW generation of toasters. We may soon be surrounded by technology that we can't even recognise because it's designed to work with other technology that we use, and there's no need to "humanify" the technology on the other side of the human-mech-mech wall. References Canton, James (2006). The Extreme Future. ??City??: ??publisher??. Canton, James (no date). THe Good, Bad, and Ugly of Business Continuity in the 21st Century. http://www.globalfuturist.com/images/docs/businesscontinuity.pdf last accessed 2008.05.13. at 17:52 CAH +5GMT. Pollock, Syndey (Director) (1975). Three Days of the Condor. imdb: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0073802/